Re: Surviving Einstein.
From: Simon Johnson (ckwop_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/29/03
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Previous message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Hmm Test Vectors...."
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 15:44:19 +0000 (UTC)
-- ------------------ You can send messages direct to Ckwop@hotmail.com but to get it past the spam filter type: jafi98 in the subject line. "Bill Unruh" <unruh@string.physics.ubc.ca> wrote in message news:bdijr7$1l7$1@nntp.itservices.ubc.ca... > "Simon Johnson" <ckwop@hotmail.com> writes: > > ]> Show me a "truly random event" and I'll show you a "physical phenomenon > ]that > ]> you do not fully understand." > ]> > > ]Prediciting the speed of an electron emitted from beta decay. > > That one is dead easy if you will accept the probability distribution > for those speeds. The actual value in any given decay cannot be > calculated, it is a random event, just as many quantum events are. > That's my point.. its a well understood problem that is truly random. (well, there is a maximum speed the electron can due to energy conservation but between that and zero its random) Yours, Simon.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Previous message: Mark Wooding: "Re: Hmm Test Vectors...."
- In reply to: Bill Unruh: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Surviving Einstein."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]