Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation
From: Marin (dolphin_at_psydolphin.nospam)
Date: 06/25/03
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:17:47 +0100
Tom St Denis wrote:
> I still would wave flags at your unions. Not only because I don't
> trust it but because it honestly is *NOT* faster. When I was porting
> Rijmen's code to LTC I experimented with various things like that.
Maybe I'm pointing out something you knew anyway, but unions are for
reducing memory requirements, not for faster code. Computers have so
much memory these days that most programmers don't bother using them
anymore.
-- Regards, Marin ----------------------------------------------------- Replace "nospam" with "net" to email me.
- Next message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- In reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Next in thread: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Reply: Tom St Denis: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Release 1.1 (beta) of my AES implementation"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|