Re: public key confusion
From: aditya (truman_at_rediffmail.com)
Date: 06/24/03
- Next message: Sisyphus: "Re: how to find the bound in pollard p-1 algorithm? need help"
- Previous message: aditya: "Re: what is a hash ?"
- In reply to: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Reply: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: public key confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 23 Jun 2003 22:16:11 -0700
>
> Yes. One key is kept secret, the other is published.
>
> Note: There is related technique in which each correspondent uses different
> "keys" to compute the same number. This common number can then be used in a
> symmetric algorithm. (Diffie-Hellman key agreement protocol)
Right. so we can have many pairs of public-private key for the same
algorithm? that is, if I am the receiver and you are the sender...i
can maintain two different private keys and out of the two public keys
generated, I can give one to you and another to some one else?
or is it possible to produce two public keys for one private key?
> secondly, the
> > generation of the public key is a mathematical function of the private
> > key- is that correct?
>
> There may (must?) be some relationship between the two, and in the systems I
> know about, there is a relationship. In those systems, the public key is
> obtained by passing the private key through a "one-way function". Thus, it
> is easy to compute the public key given the private key, but it is assumed
> to be very difficult to compute the private key from the public key.
>
so the public key generation is a function of (i.e, dependent on )the
private key. So cant we simply use a hashing function to generate the
public key, using the private key as input?
thanks and regards,
Aditya
- Next message: Sisyphus: "Re: how to find the bound in pollard p-1 algorithm? need help"
- Previous message: aditya: "Re: what is a hash ?"
- In reply to: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Next in thread: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Reply: John E. Hadstate: "Re: public key confusion"
- Reply: Bill Unruh: "Re: public key confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|