Re: AES or Triple DES?
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn_at_null.net)
Date: 06/21/03
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Book about SIGSALY, SIGCUM, SIGTOT"
- Previous message: clem: "Re: rsa question (relative newbie to the crypto aspect)"
- Maybe in reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Next in thread: Simon Johnson: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Reply: Simon Johnson: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 23:37:16 -0400
fungus wrote:
> I just have a slightly warmer and a bit fuzzier
> feeling about AES 256 than AES 128, what with
> AES being so new and all...
But note that really good cryptanalytic attacks
typically don't scale exponentially with the key
size. Don't be fooled by the properties of the
dumb brute-force key-search attack.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Book about SIGSALY, SIGCUM, SIGTOT"
- Previous message: clem: "Re: rsa question (relative newbie to the crypto aspect)"
- Maybe in reply to: Tom St Denis: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Next in thread: Simon Johnson: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Reply: Simon Johnson: "Re: AES or Triple DES?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]