Stupid(?) question(s) about solitaire cipher
From: Markus Jansson (jansson_markus_at_ziplip.com)
Date: 06/21/03
- Next message: unknown: "integrity aware PCBC paper"
- Previous message: Markus Jansson: "How to re-key in paper&pencil cipher?"
- Next in thread: Simon Johnson: "Re: Stupid(?) question(s) about solitaire cipher"
- Reply: Simon Johnson: "Re: Stupid(?) question(s) about solitaire cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 02:37:37 +0300
Does it increase security to put two decks of cards (total of 104 cards)
to the deck you use to encrypt (instead of the default of one deck of
cards)? I would think yes and it doesnt make the encrypting/using the
deck too complicated either.
How about encrypting the message with one deck, then re-encrypting with
second deck, then re-encrypting it with third deck, etc. etc.? Or
encrypting it once with deck of cards (52 cards in total), then with
"three deck of cards" deck (156 cards in total), then with deck of cards
(52 cards in total)?
I have tryed the solitaire cipher (with one deck) and I have found that
its not that slow either. You could easily carry couple/few deck of
cards with you and re-encrypt the message couple times if you want more
security and was just wondering... :)
-- My computer security & privacy related homepage http://www.markusjansson.net PGP keys fingerprints: 9966C10DDC7F0DEDEC480A75FE952445F24D55DD 5C504F891BEAB54FF5E7250223B2B27CD6C1FDA2
- Next message: unknown: "integrity aware PCBC paper"
- Previous message: Markus Jansson: "How to re-key in paper&pencil cipher?"
- Next in thread: Simon Johnson: "Re: Stupid(?) question(s) about solitaire cipher"
- Reply: Simon Johnson: "Re: Stupid(?) question(s) about solitaire cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
