Re: OMAC help
From: unknown (unknown_at_unknown.com)
Date: 06/14/03
- Next message: Mika Bostrom: "Re: Historical Evidence or Possibility of Steganography in Music"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: OMAC help"
- Next in thread: Jack Lloyd: "Re: OMAC help"
- Reply: Jack Lloyd: "Re: OMAC help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:50:27 +0100
> > there is OMAC1 and OMAC2 - where OMAC2 (the original spec) uses a
> > E_k(0) * u^-1 as one of the keys, OMAC1 uses E_k(0) * u^2 instead.
I have
> > found OMAC1 to be significantly more convenient to implement.
Though
> > which one NIST will standardize is pretty much up in the air -
when I
> > asked Morris Dworkin, all he would say is "we generally defer to
the
> > algorithm designers in such matters"
Hi all,
I'm having some problems in understanding how to deal with
polynomial multiplication, so I would be very grateful if you could
help me.
In the EAX paper it is defined that B=2L and P=2(2L). I can
understan this, however, in the EMD paper, it is defined that some
value (hereinafter designated by Xi) is defined by Xi=iL for i=1..n
(the polynomial X is the same). How can this be calculated for i other
than 2 and 4?
Could you please represent, in pseudo-code, a function to
calculate the values from i=1 to i=n ?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
unknown
- Next message: Mika Bostrom: "Re: Historical Evidence or Possibility of Steganography in Music"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: OMAC help"
- Next in thread: Jack Lloyd: "Re: OMAC help"
- Reply: Jack Lloyd: "Re: OMAC help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]