Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 06/11/03
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Techincal Error in Steven Levy's "Crypto""
- Previous message: DJohn37050: "Re: Techincal Error in Steven Levy's "Crypto""
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:41:22 +0000 (UTC)
Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> Shill wrote:
>> > Moreover, // is a valid comment delimiter in C99.
>> Very true, but since the OP used a C90 compiler, .....
>
> Certainly very unessential, nevertheless it interests
> me how did you deduce that I used a C90 compiler.
You said you'd used the Microsoft compiler. They haven't released a
C99-conforming compiler. The deduction is a simple one.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Techincal Error in Steven Levy's "Crypto""
- Previous message: DJohn37050: "Re: Techincal Error in Steven Levy's "Crypto""
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|