Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 06/11/03
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:23:22 +0000 (UTC)
Shill wrote:
>> Sure. You tried to use a division operator twice in succession,
>> with no numerator or divisor for the first of them.
>
> Richard,
>
> You are not trying very hard...
Well, elsethread he asked for a list of the problems, so I provided them
there in full. This was more a sort of one-liner. :-)
>
> Moreover, // is a valid comment delimiter in C99.
Very true, but since the OP used a C90 compiler, and since he advertises the
code as being for "32-bit platforms" rather than "C99 platforms", I thought
he would probably appreciate C90-based replies rather than C99-based
replies.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]