Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 06/11/03
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 06:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
<snip>
>
> One should use int main() according to
> the new C standard, if I don't err.)
Indeed. And according to the old C standard, too. And before that, there was
no such thing as void anyway. void main() has never been correct in C or in
C++ (although it is correct in Java, oddly enough).
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Richard Heathfield: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Michael Amling: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|