Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Shill (nobody_at_example.com)
Date: 06/11/03
- Next message: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "(long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 01:36:37 +0200
[snip]
gcc 2.95.3 doesn't like // comment delimiters.
As others have pointed out, main() should return an int.
When you define a union type such as union TABLE, variables of that
type should be defined as "union TABLE var" not just "TABLE var".
e.g.
union TABLE
{ byte b[1024];
byte bm[256][4];
word w[256];
};
TABLE t0,t1,t2,t3,v0,v1,v2,v3;
In display(), k is.
- Next message: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "(long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Shill: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|