Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Richard Heathfield (dontmail_at_address.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 06/11/03
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "(long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:38:45 +0000 (UTC)
Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
> Recently in discussions in another thread I suggested
> that unions are well suited for byte-array implementations
> of AES.
Your code generated many dozens of compiler errors on gcc (in conforming
mode). I suggest you increase your warning level.
-- Richard Heathfield : binary@eton.powernet.co.uk "Usenet is a strange place." - Dennis M Ritchie, 29 July 1999. C FAQ: http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html K&R answers, C books, etc: http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "(long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]