Re: (long) An AES implementation for 32-bit platforms
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:17:01 +0200
Tom St Denis wrote:
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> > I offered my code for free use, I don't charge anything.
> > If you find a hardware on which it doesn't work, then
> > tell me that, but not before with your theories, please.
> I don't charge anything for LTM or LTC neither. Doesn't mean I do a
> half-buttocks job of it. When report credible bugs/flaws in my code I
> take a serious look and fix it. And let me remind you that both LTM and
> LTC are wickedly more complicated than single AES implementation to not
> only debug but test in the many numerous configurations possible [hint
> to the recent bug in LTM concerning Montgomery reductions that came up
> only in a certain configuration].
It sounds that you want to take the occasion to
propagate you own codes. That's not relevant to
this thread. If you find facts, then you come out
supreme in your arguments, but not before.
M. K. Shen