Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ....
From: John E. Hadstate (nospam_at_null.nil)
Date: 06/07/03
- Next message: psybar phreak: "Re: stenography"
- Previous message: John E. Hadstate: "Re: stenography"
- In reply to: Danilo Gligoroski: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- Next in thread: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 09:45:20 -0400
"Danilo Gligoroski" <gligoroski@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fd6035bb.0306070111.541d1e02@posting.google.com...
>
> You don't need to reply so rude. Read carefully the reply of Greg
> Rose, where he mentioned their new algorithm SOBER-128 that meets all
> of the above criteria. However, you didn't answered on his message
> with this style.
>
> And, again, read carefully my message. I said: "If he want to try and
> experiment", not to use it.
I have to agree with Tom. You have shown no basis for your claims, and you
have established no real credibility here. Comparing your post to a similar
one by Greg Rose is unabashed hubris, though I suspect you don't understand
why.
If the OP wants "reasonable security" he could use my Marlin III cipher
which hasn't been designed yet, but when it is, it will be unbreakable,
military grade, government quality and pretty secure, too.
- Next message: psybar phreak: "Re: stenography"
- Previous message: John E. Hadstate: "Re: stenography"
- In reply to: Danilo Gligoroski: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- Next in thread: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: Stream Cipher Like SEAL Wanted ...."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
