Re: Definition of Military / Government grade ciphers
From: Albert P. Belle Isle (belleisl_at_CerberusSystems.com)
Date: 05/30/03
- Next message: bill_at_nedell.com: "Re: Breaking Huffman Codes"
- Previous message: Dann Corbit: "Re: new factoring algorithm"
- In reply to: majikcypher: "Definition of Military / Government grade ciphers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 01:26:46 GMT
On 28 May 2003 18:08:55 -0700, nationalsecurity@softhome.net
(majikcypher) wrote:
>Most of the different ciphers I use to encrypt my files are labeled as
>"Military Grade" or "government Strength". But exactly what does this
>mean (and NO i don't mean do they USE the type of encryption because
>that is sort of obvious and I know that it means that it passes their
>little test of how good it should be but I want to know exactly how
>good it has to be to be given this name)? Also what do you think are
>the strongest algorithms (publicly). I like Blowfish and Rijndael.
Cryptographic products for the protection of DoD Classified
information (TYPE I cryptosystems) are provided by NSA from a standard
list under a rigorous system of inventory and management. More
importantly, all the keying material used in them must be provided by
NSA through that same accounting and protection system.
For Sensitive-But-Unclassified information (For Official Use Only
data, Privacy Act data, FedWire money transfers, etc.) approved TYPE
II cryptosystems may be used. This includes FIPS 140-certified
cryptosystems employing FIPS 46-3 (the Digital Encryption Standard
which now specifies the TDEA cipher - "3DES" - in an approved mode).
People who use the meaningless marketing term "military grade" seldom
have any connection with (or understanding of) what the US military
uses.
Albert P. BELLE ISLE
Cerberus Systems, Inc.
================================================
ENCRYPTION SOFTWARE with
Forensic Software Countermeasures
http://www.CerberusSystems.com
================================================
- Next message: bill_at_nedell.com: "Re: Breaking Huffman Codes"
- Previous message: Dann Corbit: "Re: new factoring algorithm"
- In reply to: majikcypher: "Definition of Military / Government grade ciphers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|