Re: Triple AES (3AES)
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 05/29/03
- Next message: Jim Steuert: "Nested Rings of different types for Public Key"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Wireless security"
- In reply to: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Next in thread: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Reply: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 20:41:38 +0200
AE wrote:
>
> jsavard@ecn.ab.ca wrote:
> > : If I'm using double encryption with one encryption being AES and the
> > : other being simple XOR with my key the result will be as strong as AES.
> >
> > : So even worst case won't uncover the key.
> >
> > Encryption with AES and then simple XOR with the key is not the worst
> > case.
> >
> > Encryption with AES using your key and decryption with AES using your key
> > would be the worst case.
> >
> > Only if the two keys are independent do we cover the possibility that one
> > cipher has been *maliciously* designed to undo the effects of the other.
>
> Looks like I'm as wrong as you were: It is true a combination of AES and
> Serpent is not necessarily as strong as the stronger of the two, but
> it's as well true that this combination - even when using the same key -
> is not as weak as the weaker of the two - maybe better, maybe worse, but
> all we know is it's different.
>
> Quite obviously we would have to see the combination as a new cipher
> with yet unknown properties.
>
> Using two different keys makes things little bit easier, but only when
> using the ciphers in OFB or CTR mode or in CFB using the output of the
> combination of both encryptions for feedback we know about the minimum
> strength of the combination.
Dumb question: What is the (inherent) reason that
distinguishes these three modes from the other modes,
in particular ECB, in the present context? Thanks.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Jim Steuert: "Nested Rings of different types for Public Key"
- Previous message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Wireless security"
- In reply to: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Next in thread: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Reply: AE: "Re: Triple AES (3AES)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|