Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis
From: JohnTromaville (johntromaville_at_aol.com)
Date: 05/21/03
- Next message: JohnTromaville: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Some Prime number questions"
- In reply to: DSCOTT: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Next in thread: JohnTromaville: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: 20 May 2003 23:47:20 GMT
>
> The AES method was not really a fair open contest. I think
>its reasonable to assume the NSA can break it or it would not
>have blessed it.
I may be wrong but hasn't NESSIE said that AES is ok for use? - Given that
Europe is a bit paranoid about the US listening in I find it hard to believe
NESSIE would have passed it. Europe has as many good crypto people as US/NSA
does surely.
anyway not want to get into that debate. If you don't trust AES and you don't
trust say GOST just double encipher with both GOST and AES (so long as the
speed is not an issue) .. I think I'm safe in saying the Russians aren't in
league with the NSA.
Trom
- Next message: JohnTromaville: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Some Prime number questions"
- In reply to: DSCOTT: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Next in thread: JohnTromaville: "Re: "Alien" cryptanalysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading