Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math...
From: Albert Yang (albert_nospam_at_achtung.com)
Date: 05/12/03
- Next message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Next in thread: Bas Ruiter: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Reply: Bas Ruiter: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:39:00 +0800
> 1. being struck by lighting per annum,
> 2. being bitten by a shark per annum,
> 3. a car/auto accident, per mile travel, per annum,
> 4. being hit by a meteorite, per annum,
The problem is, 128 bit is twice as secure as 127bit.. ;-) The think,
128bit, jumped to 196 bit ... still seems like small numbers to me (one
of the comments I got from a CIO before...)
Also, they say things like, "yes, but people DO get struck by lightning!"
They fail to see the scope/size of these numbers..
Albert
- Next message: Paul Rubin: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Previous message: John A. Malley: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- In reply to: John A. Malley: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Next in thread: Bas Ruiter: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Reply: Bas Ruiter: "Re: Winning consumer confidence via complex math..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]