Re: Consequences of breaking RSA, AES

From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen_at_t-online.de)
Date: 05/11/03 

Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 13:25:56 +0200

Bryan Olson wrote:
>
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
>
> > The first post of Scheffer explained how the options
> > function. But that's irrelevant to the discussion I
> > had with Percival. I pointed out (in the form of
> > a question) that Percival's statement that one could
> > always win 'independent' of the ups and downs of
> > the market is false.
>
> Colin Percival made no such statement.

I qouted him previously. BTW, see also a follow-up to
Sheffer just sent.

M. K. Shen

Relevant Pages

  • T.O. crossposting problems -- was: PZ on Bird/Frog Development -- Great article -- Should it be an
    ... Would you please take care to remove SAP when ... robomoderator. ... The first post in it was written by me ... I have set a follow-up to only t.o. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Is {f_k(x)=x^k mod n} a pseudorandom function family?
    ... > Bryan Olson wrote: ... >> Had you followed my advice, you would have understood the issue ... > public that your action in the first follow-up was less ... Dude, Bryan is not the only one who is disgusted with your lack of ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: strengthening /dev/urandom
    ... Bryan Olson wrote in ... > What an odd thing to say in a follow-up to a post that doesn't ... > mention 'state compromise attacks'. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Coloring of a map
    ... > Bryan Olson wrote: ... >> just showed the ignorance of your literal observation. ... >> this stupid plagiarism idea entirely to you. ... > Why did you comment on my first post 'at all'? ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: VS 2005 questions
    ... response to my first post. ... Call it what you will, my original comment and follow-up still stand, regardless of your non-response. ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
Loading