Re: Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?
From: Jack Lloyd (lloyd_at_jhu.edu)
Date: 05/09/03
- Next message: Mads Rasmussen: "Re: DVI2PS or DVItoPS"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Consequences of breaking RSA, AES"
- In reply to: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Next in thread: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Re: Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Reply: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Re: Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:46:55 -0400
On Fri, 09 May 2003 10:47:24 -0400, mrpolitics.mrkane wrote:
> n/t
Depends on what you mean by best:
- bzip2 will compress larger text files very well, but it has poor
latency and uses up a good bit of memory, and lots of CPU.
- zlib/gzip/zip (same algorithm, different formats): better latency,
good overall compression (but not as tight as bzip2), still quite
a bit of memory and CPU.
- arithmetic coding: really good compression, but patented.
- various other things, like LZ77-derived compressors, are often faster
and/or more memory/CPU efficient and/or have better latency.
- Next message: Mads Rasmussen: "Re: DVI2PS or DVItoPS"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Consequences of breaking RSA, AES"
- In reply to: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Next in thread: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Re: Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Reply: mrpolitics.mrkane: "Re: Whats known as the best text compression methed for regular text files?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|