Re: Cohen's paper on byte order
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 04/30/03
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:34:30 GMT
"Lassi Hippeläinen" <lahippel@ieee.orgasm-research.invalid> wrote in
> The 68000 had two major marketing problems:
You mean engineering problems? You give a argument that 68000
systems were not really superior.
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]