Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 04/30/03
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Next in thread: jsavard_at_ecn.ab.ca: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:28:21 GMT
"Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net> wrote
> >>Quantum cryptography has nothing to do with quantum computing...
> > Not much, except that quantum cryptography needs a quantum
> > computer in every repeater and router.
> No! Quantum cryptography merely exploits quantum coherence
> to detect intrusion, or meet some other cryptographic goal.
> "Quantum" *equipment* is required, but that equipment does
> not by any means qualify as quantum computing. The two
> really are quite different.
How do you make a repeater or router without a quantum computer?
> > I don't see much difference. Cold fusion and quantum computing are both
> > just ideas. In both cases, the physics says that it might be possible,
but
> > no
> > one has figured out how to do it. Neither is likely in our lifetimes. If
I
> > had
> > to bet on one or the other, I am not sure which I would pick.
> Cold fusion was obviously a bogus notion in the first place, ...
Maybe some breakthru will make it possible.
> Quantum computing, on the other hand, is not only supported
> by theory, but has been reliably demonstrated in the lab
> (although only on a small scale at present).
I am not convinced of this. There are some quantum mechanics
experiments (such as nuclear magnetic resonance) that have been
repackaged as quantum computing demos, but I don't think
that they have really computed anything, or that they are stepping
stones towards building a quantum computer.
There are various people who have claimed to built a qubit,
and even someone who has claimed to have factored 15 with
qubits, but I don't think that there is even a convincing demo
of 1 qubit. I hope they do, but it seems like it will take some
sort of breakthru.
- Next message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Next in thread: jsavard_at_ecn.ab.ca: "Re: Crypto Mini-FAQ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|