Re: Why is AES more secure than DES??

From: Paul Crowley (paul_at_JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org)
Date: 04/29/03 

Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:26:44 GMT

"Yuen" <Yuen@123.com> writes:

> I encrypt a block of data 0xFFF times, the result:
> AES128 0.0200(seconds)
> AES256 0.0200(seconds)
> DES 0.4500 (seconds)
>
> AES is much faster, but why is AES more secure than DES??
> When cracking a message, faster decryption is easier to crack?? because one
> can guess more password per second.
> The cracking method is "guess all possible password"

Read http://www.counterpane.com/low-entropy.html 

-- 
  __  Paul Crowley
\/ o\ sig@paul.ciphergoth.org
/\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? ... <cryptographers were in their design strategy the structure of the ... Reminds me of the conspiracy guys, which discard any evidence coming from governmental sources as faked, except if they think they can spot ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... perhaps you will demonstrate how to crack it? ... AES ciphertext that the person was able to demonstrate. ... made at the time" by the member of sci crypt.. ... myself and the original readers posting. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? ... Two days prior to this a reader had posted an article announcing the ... made at the time" by the member of sci crypt.. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? ... AES ciphertext that the person was able to demonstrate. ... made at the time" by the member of sci crypt.. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Diffie Hellman to generate Symmetric key
    ... generally believed that even the latter does not lose security. ... difficulty of cracking a 1024-bit Diffie-Hellman system is greater than ... that of cracking 128-bit AES, and so one should use AES with a 256-bit ...
    (sci.crypt)