Re: Cohen's paper on byte order
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow@eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 04/16/03
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Andrew Swallow" <am.swallow@eatspam.btinternet.com> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:16:37 +0000 (UTC)
"Brian Gladman" <fake@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:6L8na.8434$9C6.296714@wards.force9.net...
[snip]
> This is easy to fix in principle but I doubt that it will be easy to
obtain
> a change to the FIPS.
>
ANSII standards have to be reviewed every 5 or 10 years, do
FIPS? If so the minor correction could be added them.
Andrew Swallow
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]