Re: Cipher choice for network packet payloads
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc@mindspring.com)
Date: 04/14/03
- Next message: Matt: "P2P & Encryption"
- Previous message: Jim Gillogly: "Re: Cryptonomicon and OTP breaking"
- In reply to: theKid: "Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Next in thread: theKid: "Re: Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Reply: theKid: "Re: Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Schlafly" <rogersc@mindspring.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:35:30 GMT
"theKid" <cmlambert@hotmail.com> wrote
> After reading various messages on this group, I'm still unsure whether
> to use a block cipher or a stream cipher for encrypting 56 bytes of
> data per packet. The data is in no specific format, so there's no
> problem using a block cipher in OFB mode.
You could use either.
> Will a stream cipher (Blowfish OFB mode) be faster at encryption than
> a 64 bit block cipher (Blowfish)? Anything else that's worth
> considering?
No, but either is likely to be plenty fast. Blowfish and OFB are
declining in popularity, so I don't know why you want to choose those.
- Next message: Matt: "P2P & Encryption"
- Previous message: Jim Gillogly: "Re: Cryptonomicon and OTP breaking"
- In reply to: theKid: "Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Next in thread: theKid: "Re: Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Reply: theKid: "Re: Cipher choice for network packet payloads"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|