Re: An URL
From: Andrew Swallow (am.swallow@eatspam.btinternet.com)
Date: 04/11/03
- Next message: Eugene Starokoltsev: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: An URL"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: An URL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Andrew Swallow" <am.swallow@eatspam.btinternet.com> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:21:18 +0000 (UTC)
"Lassi Hippeläinen" <lahippel@ieee.orgasm-research.invalid> wrote in message
news:3E96A1F8.C70C19AC@ieee.orgasm-research.invalid...
> "John E. Hadstate" wrote:
> <...>
> > Such a gaffe might be (should be) completely overlooked in a magazine
like
> > Time or Newsweek. In a magazine whose primary audience is Electrical
> > Engineers, "carrying 10 kV of dc power" leaves me feeling sick to my
> > stomach.
>
> Maybe the source was
> http://zdnet.com.com/2100-11-529826.html?legacy=zdnn, which says:
> "Making a surreptitious tap of a live cable would also require
> circumventing the electrical charge--usually around 10,000 volts--which
> is used to power the devices that keep the speeding light beams strong."
>
> At least the IEEE noticed that if a thing is measured in volts, it ain't
> charge ;-)
>
10,000 volts dc could be used for long distance transmission of
electrical power under water. The under-water power cable
between England and France for instance is direct current.
However for a signalling cable that is an enormous voltage.
Andrew Swallow
- Next message: Eugene Starokoltsev: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Brian Gladman: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Lassi Hippeläinen : "Re: An URL"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: An URL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|