Re: Cohen's paper on byte order
From: Douglas A. Gwyn (DAGwyn@null.net)
Date: 04/06/03
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: MD5 Password Gen C-Code"
- Previous message: Immanuel Albrecht: "Re: *Quantum Computing* expert Bill Munro"
- In reply to: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 15:43:07 -0400 From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
Roger Schlafly wrote:
> That's right, and it has been true for about 30 years. Over 99.9%
> of programmers today have never seen a computer with a
> byte being something other than 8 bits, and never will.
First, you're completely wrong. There are processors of
recent design that are not 8-bit oriented, although of
course one can program them to handle 8-bit objects when
necessary.
Second, if your claim about programmers is true, it is a
shame they are so poorly educated, but that has no
bearing on the meaning of concepts with which they may
be unfamiliar.
- Next message: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: MD5 Password Gen C-Code"
- Previous message: Immanuel Albrecht: "Re: *Quantum Computing* expert Bill Munro"
- In reply to: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|