Re: Cohen's paper on byte order
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@t-online.de)
Date: 04/05/03
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 10:14:22 +0200
"Douglas A. Gwyn" worte:
>
> Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> > The document describes only an 'algorithm' ...
>
> Yes, that is the defect. Since there is no specification
> for connecting that algorithm to the real world, it is
> unusable without some further, nonstandard, specification.
> AES was meant to replace DES, not DEA.
Couldn't one say the same for the quicksort algorithm,
for example?? The most 'general' case is this: The user
has a block of information, with 128 bits designated
by 0-127 (according to him). Where these bits are is
information that an implementor has to acquire, of
course. He treats these as the similarly designated
(abstract) bits in the AES document and maps them
to the hardware bits that he choose to designate as
0-127 (bijectively). Whether these hardware bits are
linearly ordered, placed in a two- or three-dimensional
matrix or randomly distributed in space, is entirely
immaterial to the proper functioning of the algorithm,
isn't it? When these processed bits are to be
transmitted to the outside world, say over a serial
channel, well, there is a normal convention that he
has somehow to observe in transmitting 'any' chunks
of bits of his hardware (in any applications, not
only encryption, e.g. 32 bits representing an integer)
out, isn't it? (What has that particularly to do with
AES??)
M. K. Shen
has to take that into consideration
- Next message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Previous message: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- In reply to: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Next in thread: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Reply: Douglas A. Gwyn: "Re: Cohen's paper on byte order"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|