Re: Q: One-way functions
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@t-online.de)
Date: 03/31/03
- Next message: mklooptbd: "RFC-2104, HMAC algo. with SHA256"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 11:30:13 +0200
Bryan Olson wrote:
>
> Mok-Kong Shen asked
> > In AC (1996 edition) Schneier wrote:
> >
> > If we are being strictly mathematical, we have no proof
> > that one-way functions exist, nor any real evidence that
> > they can be constructed.
> >
> > Have researches in the meantime ameriolated in 'any' sense
> > that picture?
>
> There's a sense in which the quote is false, but in the sense
> Schneier meant, the answer is no. Whether one-way functions exist
> (as they are typically defined in cryptology) is still open.
Thanks in particular for the last sentence. (I was
reading something based on the assumption of the
existence of one-way function.)
M. K. Shen
- Next message: mklooptbd: "RFC-2104, HMAC algo. with SHA256"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- In reply to: Bryan Olson: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|