Re: Q: One-way functions
From: Bryan Olson (bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com)
Date: 03/31/03
- Next message: David Wilson: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- Previous message: Scott Fluhrer: "Re: Faster way to use RSA..."
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Q: One-way functions"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com (Bryan Olson) Date: 30 Mar 2003 17:58:27 -0800
Mok-Kong Shen asked
> In AC (1996 edition) Schneier wrote:
>
> If we are being strictly mathematical, we have no proof
> that one-way functions exist, nor any real evidence that
> they can be constructed.
>
> Have researches in the meantime ameriolated in 'any' sense
> that picture?
There's a sense in which the quote is false, but in the sense
Schneier meant, the answer is no. Whether one-way functions exist
(as they are typically defined in cryptology) is still open.
> Any references?
Stating what? That it hasn't been settled as of yesterday?
Note that the existence of a one-way function implies P != NP.
Finding one and proving it is one would be a big deal.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: David Wilson: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- Previous message: Scott Fluhrer: "Re: Faster way to use RSA..."
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Q: One-way functions"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Q: One-way functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]