Re: Theory of hash funcs
From: Roger Schlafly (rogersc@mindspring.com)
Date: 03/30/03
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Laws concerning cryptography in different countries"
- Previous message: Punchy: "Re: For Mr Douglas A. Gwyn, aka Matt Craig Matfys lurker Byron Bean Lassi Hippelainen"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Roger Schlafly" <rogersc@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 20:07:15 GMT
"David Wagner" <daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote
> No kidding. I almost couldn't believe it when I heard that this
> "theoretical weakness" actually allowed to bypass the Xbox protection
> in practice.
There is now another Xbox exploit that allows user to boot Linux
without replacing the ROM chip. From what I read, it appears not
to use the hash function weakness, and instead uses a buffer
overflow bug in the code that some games use to save the
current disk. It allows booting Linux, but not running unlicensed
games. See:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/03/30/1337234.shtml?tid=106
I assume that the buffer overflow bug is Msft's, since it appears
in several different games. Msft's Xbox game loader will only
run programs with a good digital signature, but that does not
protect against a signed program having a buffer overflow.
- Next message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Laws concerning cryptography in different countries"
- Previous message: Punchy: "Re: For Mr Douglas A. Gwyn, aka Matt Craig Matfys lurker Byron Bean Lassi Hippelainen"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Theory of hash funcs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|