Re: Does Block Size Affect Security
From: Paul Crowley (paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org)
Date: 03/30/03
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: SHA-1 Functions"
- In reply to: Xizor: "Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Next in thread: DJohn37050: "Re: Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Reply: DJohn37050: "Re: Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Paul Crowley <paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org> Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:30:00 GMT
"Xizor" <nope@nope.com> writes:
> I'm new to encryption and right now I'm using a C++ wrapper for
> Rijndael. My question is this: does the block size affect the
> security? Is there an optimal relationship between the size of the
> block and the size of the key? Thanks in advance.
Only the 128-bit block size has seen thorough analysis and been
standardised as AES.
If you can, use something like SSL or GPG for crypto rather than
trying to roll your own system by hand; there are many more pitfalls
than you might guess and you'll almost certainly end up with something
insecure. If you must do it yourself, though, remember to use a
proper chaining mode and MAC. CCM mode is probably the easiest to get
right.
-- __ Paul Crowley \/ o\ sig@paul.ciphergoth.org /\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: SHA-1 Functions"
- In reply to: Xizor: "Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Next in thread: DJohn37050: "Re: Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Reply: DJohn37050: "Re: Does Block Size Affect Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]