Re: Extending 5-level code
From: Lassi Hippeläinen (lahippel@ieee.orgasm-research.invalid)
Date: 03/27/03
- Next message: John E. Hadstate: "Bit Balancing (or not) by table lookup"
- Previous message: Matt Craig: "Re: Newbie having trouble with cracking a cypher"
- In reply to: Eric Fischer: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Next in thread: Russ Holsclaw: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Reply: Russ Holsclaw: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Reply: Charles Richmond: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Lassi Hippeläinen <lahippel@ieee.orgasm-research.invalid> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:06:15 GMT
Eric Fischer wrote:
<...>
> The standard gives the impression that the null character is intended
> to take you to a fourth case of national-use characters but doesn't
> give any details.
The null character is needed to produce empty punch tape.
-- Lassi
- Next message: John E. Hadstate: "Bit Balancing (or not) by table lookup"
- Previous message: Matt Craig: "Re: Newbie having trouble with cracking a cypher"
- In reply to: Eric Fischer: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Next in thread: Russ Holsclaw: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Reply: Russ Holsclaw: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Reply: Charles Richmond: "Re: Extending 5-level code"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|