Re: ANNOUNCE: Leopard10 CSPRNG
From: Bob Jenkins (bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net)
Date: 03/24/03
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- In reply to: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Leopard10 CSPRNG"
- Next in thread: Yama: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Leopard10 CSPRNG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: bob_jenkins@burtleburtle.net (Bob Jenkins) Date: 23 Mar 2003 17:34:52 -0800
mrsjunecarey@aol.com (Mrsjunecarey) wrote in message news:<20030320130010.18805.00000103@mb-ct.aol.com>...
>
> (c) Robert Jenkins had a look over L9 and couldn't find a way to break it. L10
> has higher security than L9.
I didn't try to hard. I found a subset of the sequence I could detect
bias in with DIEHARD and called it a night. I haven't found the
motivation to look at L10. I've been off implementing something
unrelated instead.
- Next message: Andrew Swallow: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- Previous message: Bill Unruh: "Re: Professional vs Amateur"
- In reply to: Mrsjunecarey: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Leopard10 CSPRNG"
- Next in thread: Yama: "Re: ANNOUNCE: Leopard10 CSPRNG"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|