Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher
From: David Wagner (daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu)
Date: 03/11/03
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: WEP: 64 bit or 128 bit?"
- Previous message: Glenn Baddeley: "Re: Gathering entropy for PRNGs on MVS"
- In reply to: Philippe Paquet: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 03:47:20 +0000 (UTC)
Philippe Paquet wrote:
>"David Wagner" <daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>> Martin4 wrote:
>> >Are there other UFNs which combine source-heavy and target-heavy
>> >rounds in this manner?
>>
>> BEAR and LION come to mind.
>
>BEAR and LION are really different. They use hash function and a stream
>cipher in their construction.
Oh, I agree they use a hash function and a stream cipher -- but
they're still UFNs that combine source-heavy and target-heavy rounds,
I think. Isn't that what was being asked? Maybe not; I don't know.
- Next message: David Wagner: "Re: WEP: 64 bit or 128 bit?"
- Previous message: Glenn Baddeley: "Re: Gathering entropy for PRNGs on MVS"
- In reply to: Philippe Paquet: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|