Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher
From: Philippe Paquet (ppaquet@reflectionsinteractive.com)
Date: 03/10/03
- Next message: Michiel Buddingh': "Re: Brute force question"
- Previous message: deal: "Re: :::Small AES question:::"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Philippe Paquet" <ppaquet@reflectionsinteractive.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 21:14:31 GMT
BEAR and LION are really different. They use hash function and a stream
cipher in their construction. ref:
- Two Practical and Provably Secure Block Ciphers: BEAR and LION (Ross
Anderson, Eli Biham)
- A Critique of BEAR and LION (Pat Morin)
"David Wagner" <daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu> wrote in message
news:b4gfpb$20jh$1@agate.berkeley.edu...
> Martin4 wrote:
> >Are there other UFNs which combine source-heavy and target-heavy
> >rounds in this manner?
>
> BEAR and LION come to mind.
- Next message: Michiel Buddingh': "Re: Brute force question"
- Previous message: deal: "Re: :::Small AES question:::"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Sinople: a 128-bit symmetric block cipher"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
