Re: Randomness from natural texts
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress@nowhere.org)
Date: 03/09/03
- Next message: Duncan MacLean: "SHA1 and entropy"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: SSL/TLS DHE suites and short exponents"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 04:44:40 GMT
Mok-Kong Shen wrote:
> I 'did' read you post, but I didn't understand, as
> I explained. If the texts have entropy, then one
> could tap that, couldn't one?
The entropy estimate is for *unknown* English text. Unless the
texts have always been handled as key material, we've no reason
to trust that there's any amount of equivocation.
It was a ludicrous idea.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: Duncan MacLean: "SHA1 and entropy"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: SSL/TLS DHE suites and short exponents"
- In reply to: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Next in thread: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Reply: Mok-Kong Shen: "Re: Randomness from natural texts"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|