Re: Wrote a little encryption program. How can you tell how good it is?

From: TC (a@b.c.d)
Date: 03/04/03

  • Next message: TC: "Re: Wrote a little encryption program. How can you tell how good it is?"
    From: "TC" <a@b.c.d>
    Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:08:56 +1030
    
    

    "ošin" <ošin@ragnarok.com> wrote in message
    news:v6898m2th3k079@corp.supernews.com...
    > > Why is VB such a bad language. Do you write your code in 1's and 0's?
    >
    > VB is a very bad language for lots of reasons that I will not repeat
    here.
    > And no, I do not write in 1s and 0s, however that has to relationship to
    the
    > fact that VB sucks (I think your were attempting some misguided analogy
    > there). Pascal, C, C++, Java, C#, and even FORTRAN are good for expressing
    > algorithms, but VB is a joke for that purpose. There are many other
    > respectable languages for expressing algorithms as well. But I do not have
    > an interest in arguing this point. My original point was not really to say
    > that VB is a joke (even though it is), but rather that you will not be
    taken
    > seriously by others in this news group if you expressing algorithms in VB.

    Well, that really is just a load of unsupported nonsense. It seems obvious
    to me (after 35 years coding in dozens of different languages) that every
    language has upsides and downsides. Why is VB any worse at "expressing
    algorithms", than any other mainstream language? I think you should
    investigate the composition of the obvious chip on your shoulder!

    I assume we are talking about the programming language Visual Basc for
    Applications (VBA) - not the development product, Visual Basic (VB).

    TC

    >
    > > If I said I wrote the code in C, I would be dissed by someone saying
    that
    > I
    > > should write in assembler.
    >
    > No, you probably would not be "dissed" for using C. In fact, you would
    > probably get flamed by more people for using assembler, perhaps even more
    > than if you used VB!
    >
    >


  • Next message: TC: "Re: Wrote a little encryption program. How can you tell how good it is?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Wrote a little encryption program. How can you tell how good it is?
      ... VB is a very bad language for lots of reasons that I will not repeat here. ... but VB is a joke for that purpose. ... seriously by others in this news group if you expressing algorithms in VB. ... > should write in assembler. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: Wrote a little encryption program. How can you tell how good it is?
      ... > VB is a very bad language for lots of reasons that I will not repeat here. ... > fact that VB sucks (I think your were attempting some misguided analogy ... As for expressing algorithms, almost any language higher on the ... evolutionary scale than assembly will do for that purpose. ...
      (sci.crypt)
    • Re: Evolution
      ... > inline assembler and larger parts by linking to an assembler ... in the HLL. ... language, particularly in smaller projects. ... > or two instructions if you ...
      (alt.lang.asm)
    • Re: HLA StdLib2 criticism
      ... HLC.EXE with an already existing C compiler and calls it HLC system. ... Suppose someone creates a new language and calls it "High Level ... Assembler" (HLA). ...
      (alt.lang.asm)
    • Re: What is an assembly language?
      ... HLA is an assembler. ... So what is this essential ability of an assembly language that is ... > that Randy-HLA isn't an x86 assembler. ...
      (alt.lang.asm)