Re: authenticated anonymous communication question
From: Jason (NOSPAMperlmodules@lunkwill.org)
Date: 02/26/03
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: Initializing GFSR Generators."
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSL questions"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: NOSPAMperlmodules@lunkwill.org (Jason) Date: 25 Feb 2003 16:26:52 -0800
Paul Rubin <http://phr.cx@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message 7x7kbpw91q.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com">news:<7x7kbpw91q.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>...
> Or maybe anonymous isn't the right word. I'm wondering if there's a
> standard protocol that lets Alice and Bob have a secure, authenticated
> conversation, that's anonymous in the sense that an eavesdropper or
> MITM can't tell that the conversation is between Alice and Bob (i.e.
> the attacker can't see the identity credentials). Alice and Bob are
[...]
Oblivious Signature-Based Envelopes could do this sort of thing if they each
know a group that the other belongs to (and which the attacker doesn't):
http://crypto.stanford.edu/~ninghui/abstracts/osbe.html
They can do a lot more, too, which we're still writing up.
-J
- Next message: John A. Malley: "Re: Initializing GFSR Generators."
- Previous message: Paul Rubin: "Re: SSL questions"
- In reply to: Paul Rubin: "authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Next in thread: Paul Rubin: "Re: authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Reply: Paul Rubin: "Re: authenticated anonymous communication question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|