:::Low level question about AES implementation:::
From: Pathos (pathos@mail.pt)
Date: 02/23/03
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Server authentication with ECC"
- Previous message: Cyber Vagrant: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Next in thread: Rick Wash: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Reply: Rick Wash: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: "Pathos" <pathos@mail.pt> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 22:18:09 -0000
Hi there...
It's in the key expansion.
The fisrt word of the Key Schedule, word[0], is the cipher key, the next
words, are a XOR between the preceding word and the word Nk positions
before, if i'm correct. (there are some other stuff to consider, like when
the word index is a multiple of Nk, but let's keep it simple for now)
Now, here's what i can't understand, if Nk=8, so this would be a 256 bits
key, the second word, word[1], in the key schedule would be the XOR between
the preceding word, word[0] that is the original cipher key, and the word 8
positions before, 8 positions before would be word[-6] (?!?!).
I'm understanding this wrongly for sure, can someone explain this small
detail to me.
Thanks for your time
Pedro Azevedo
- Next message: Michael Amling: "Server authentication with ECC"
- Previous message: Cyber Vagrant: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Next in thread: Rick Wash: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Reply: Rick Wash: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Reply: Michael Amling: "Re: :::Low level question about AES implementation:::"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|