Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?
From: Paul Crowley (paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org)
Date: 02/23/03
- Next message: Francois Grieu: "NFS sieving parameters"
- Previous message: Erwann ABALEA: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- In reply to: Shane Hird: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Next in thread: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Reply: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Paul Crowley <paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:25:08 GMT
"Shane Hird" <shanehird@hotmail.com> writes:
> Yep.. The key will be used as an identifier as well, which has already
> been fixed to 128 bits. For backwards compatibility it would be good
> to use those same bits for the public key.
In that case you have no problem. Use whatever PK system you like,
and use SHA-1 to hash the public key, truncating the output to 128
bits; this is sometimes called a key "fingerprint". Transmit the full
public key along with everything you sign, and you'll be able to
verify that it came from that ID.
-- __ Paul Crowley \/ o\ sig@paul.ciphergoth.org /\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/
- Next message: Francois Grieu: "NFS sieving parameters"
- Previous message: Erwann ABALEA: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- In reply to: Shane Hird: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Next in thread: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Reply: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|