Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?
From: Rick Wash (rwash@citi.umich.edu)
Date: 02/23/03
- Next message: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Previous message: Rainer Urian: "CSPRNG for Pocket PC"
- In reply to: Shane Hird: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Next in thread: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Reply: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Rick Wash <rwash@citi.umich.edu> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:19:25 GMT
In article <3e584377$0$13177$5a62ac22@freenews.iinet.net.au>, Shane Hird wrote:
> Yep.. The key will be used as an identifier as well, which has
> already been fixed to 128 bits. For backwards compatibility it would
> be good to use those same bits for the public key.
>
> I'm trying to add digital signatures to file requests in a p2p
> application to assist in a credit system. Currently the protocol
> uses no authentication at all, just trusts the ID that is sent to
> it.
Can you take this 128-bit identifier and feed it into a pseudo-random
number generator to output a larger public key?
Rick
- Next message: Peter Fairbrother: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Previous message: Rainer Urian: "CSPRNG for Pocket PC"
- In reply to: Shane Hird: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Next in thread: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Reply: shane: "Re: 128bit RSA public key - time to break?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|