Re: Please Cure My Ignorance (I know that may be difficult :-)) on Hash Functions
From: Paul Crowley (paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org)
Date: 02/20/03
- Next message: Isaac To: "Re: Encrypting again an already encrypted file increase security ?"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: a question about hash"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Please Cure My Ignorance (I know that may be difficult :-)) on Hash Functions"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Please Cure My Ignorance (I know that may be difficult :-)) on Hash Functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Paul Crowley <paul@JUNKCATCHER.ciphergoth.org> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:25:05 GMT
daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu (David Wagner) writes:
> Douglas A. Gwyn wrote:
> >That is only possible if the so-called function doesn't
> >return, period.
>
> And even then it's not a mathematical function.
> Computer scientists might call such an algorithm a
> "function" or a "procedure" or a "subroutine", but it's
> not what mathematicians would call a function.
...unless you consider that this (and other sorts of failure) map the
input onto a special symbol "bottom" (drawn as an upside-down T).
-- __ Paul Crowley \/ o\ sig@paul.ciphergoth.org /\__/ http://www.ciphergoth.org/
- Next message: Isaac To: "Re: Encrypting again an already encrypted file increase security ?"
- Previous message: Paul Crowley: "Re: a question about hash"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Please Cure My Ignorance (I know that may be difficult :-)) on Hash Functions"
- Next in thread: Paul Crowley: "Re: Please Cure My Ignorance (I know that may be difficult :-)) on Hash Functions"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]