Re: Clipsecure encryption software question
From: lurker (na@nospam.org)
Date: 02/19/03
- Next message: Paul Pires: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Rijndael's algorithm - books??"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Next in thread: nameless: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: na@nospam.org (lurker) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:45:25 GMT
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:19:16 +0000 (UTC), daw@mozart.cs.berkeley.edu
(David Wagner) wrote:
>lurker wrote:
>>Pegasus is a lesser known and less complex email package so it is less
>>vulnerable.
>
>I wouldn't rely on the "lesser known" part too heavily for security. The
>limitations of security through obscurity are well known. I definitely
>agree that "less complex" is usually good for security, though.
Clipsecure looks like a very flexible little program. Many users
don't want to be bothered with copying ciphertext out of their mail
and then spawning a seperate encryption process. Pegasus should work
seamlessly with this product and offer integrated passphrase entry.
The fact that Clipsecure will be open source for version 1.2 will
allow any number of options to be added.
- Next message: Paul Pires: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Previous message: Roger Schlafly: "Re: Rijndael's algorithm - books??"
- In reply to: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Next in thread: nameless: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|