Re: Clipsecure encryption software question
From: lurker (na@nospam.org)
Date: 02/19/03
- Next message: Andrew Lee: "Re: ANNOUNCE: New "Leopard6" CSPRNG !"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Maybe reply: nameless: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: na@nospam.org (lurker) Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:43:27 GMT
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:22:21 +0100, Fritz Wuehler
<fritz@rodent.frell.eu.org> wrote:
>Hello there,
>
>as I'm not an expert I would like to know if anyone have tested this
>software "Clipsecure" and can give me further advice.
>
>www26.brinkster.com/belzecue/clipsecure.htm
>
>thanks.
>john
>
Looks like a nice light encryption scheme for outlook explorer. For
serious protection you would probably have better luck getting a
version of Pegasus email that supports extensions using the Wpmforms
developer package or writing your own system YMMV.
Pegasus is a lesser known and less complex email package so it is less
vulnerable. You can specify the trigger of your choice without having
to specify in the email that it contains any encryption and you are
not limited to static session keys.
- Next message: Andrew Lee: "Re: ANNOUNCE: New "Leopard6" CSPRNG !"
- Previous message: Tom St Denis: "Re: diehard and ent results quesion"
- Next in thread: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Reply: David Wagner: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Maybe reply: nameless: "Re: Clipsecure encryption software question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]