Re: Braided ciphers
From: Mok-Kong Shen (mok-kong.shen@t-online.de)
Date: 02/09/03
- Next message: Aldo: "Re: Proving primality of an integer"
- Previous message: D. Touie: "Re: Proving primality of an integer"
- In reply to: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Next in thread: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Reply: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Mok-Kong Shen <mok-kong.shen@t-online.de> Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 23:29:18 +0100
AE wrote:
>
> ( a AND s ) OR ( b AND NOT s)
>
> So here is the result:
>
> A and B weak, S strong: 50% of the plaintext can be recovered
>
> for a = b the plaintext bit is known
> for a = NOT b the plaintext bit is unknown
[snip]
How does one know which bit positions correspond to
the case a=b? Does the fact that A and B are weak
allow that to be determined? Thanks.
M. K. Shen
- Next message: Aldo: "Re: Proving primality of an integer"
- Previous message: D. Touie: "Re: Proving primality of an integer"
- In reply to: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Next in thread: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Reply: AE: "Re: Braided ciphers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|