Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?

From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress@nowhere.org)
Date: 01/19/03 

From: Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:33:22 GMT

flip wrote:

> I think this number is prime and the poster might be a troll as he hasn't
> produced the factorization he claims!
>
> Thanks for double checking it and now I think he is wrong even more. He
> still hasn't produced said factorization!

Ah, good. I have not seen the original post, and I thought your
post meant that you knew the number to be composite. Since you
also knew the correct citation for Miller's factor-knowing-totient
method, that situation seemed odd.

That sucker's prime. 

-- 
--Bryan

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Why factoring solution must work
    ... demonstration factorization of 15. ... That's a weird assumption since my original post notes that given ... Mathematical absolute. ... Actually what I said was that I would get a lot of work if RSA was ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: factoring higher degree questions
    ... >> yes i seem to not be able to find the original post, ... > There are many entries if you use google to search for the terms ... i spell it 'factorisation' as i am british, ... americanisms such as 'factorization' ...
    (sci.math.symbolic)
  • Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?
    ... "flip" wrote: ... > I think this number is prime and the poster might be a troll as he hasn't ... > produced the factorization he claims! ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Kanji, Katakana, and Hiragana are different LANGUAGES.
    ... he defends against all other's reasonable correction of his mistakes. ... Glenn Maynard, most likely correctly, warned us this post was a troll. ... the original post was a serious hypothesis, ... thread would enable the poster to correct the fallacies in the original ...
    (sci.lang.japan)