Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?
From: Bryan Olson (fakeaddress@nowhere.org)
Date: 01/19/03
- Next message: jsavard@ecn.ab.ca: "Encrypting the Length of a File"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- Next in thread: Phil Carmody: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
From: Bryan Olson <fakeaddress@nowhere.org> Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:33:22 GMT
flip wrote:
> I think this number is prime and the poster might be a troll as he hasn't
> produced the factorization he claims!
>
> Thanks for double checking it and now I think he is wrong even more. He
> still hasn't produced said factorization!
Ah, good. I have not seen the original post, and I thought your
post meant that you knew the number to be composite. Since you
also knew the correct citation for Miller's factor-knowing-totient
method, that situation seemed odd.
That sucker's prime.
-- --Bryan
- Next message: jsavard@ecn.ab.ca: "Encrypting the Length of a File"
- Previous message: Cristiano: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- In reply to: flip: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- Next in thread: Phil Carmody: "Re: Why Does This Number Fail All Primality Tests?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
