Re: firewall on budget ?
- From: Leythos <void@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:54:19 -0400
In article <f8bcgsUkraL3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, usenet-2007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
says...
On 2007-07-27 jameshanley39@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
something went wrong here..
Yes. And it's you starting to crosspost this back to csf again. Stop it.
What I wrote is NOT related to firewalls.
My reply to ansgar only went to
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
Which is exactly where it belongs.
not to comp.security.firewalls.
Which is because it doesn't belong there.
Actually, the thread started in csf and it's completely on topic there
and here in mpws. So it does belong there as security is a common issue
no matter how we address the solution.
--
Leythos
- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a
drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- Re: firewall on budget ?
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
- Re: firewall on budget ?
- Prev by Date: Re: How do I allow non-admin user add a route to route table?
- Next by Date: Re: firewall on budget ?
- Previous by thread: Re: firewall on budget ?
- Next by thread: Re: How do I unblock a URL that I blocked in error in Adobe Acrobat Pr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|