Re: firewall on budget ?
- From: Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers <usenet-2007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:59:24 +0200 (CEST)
On 2007-07-27 jameshanley39@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
something went wrong here..
Yes. And it's you starting to crosspost this back to csf again. Stop it.
What I wrote is NOT related to firewalls.
My reply to ansgar only went to
microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin
Which is exactly where it belongs.
not to comp.security.firewalls.
Which is because it doesn't belong there.
I think 'cos ansgar added a 'follow-up' field, and it seems what that
did was cause my reply to only go there, and not to the newsgroup
where I read the message and clicked reply(comp.security.firewalls).
I was only looking in csf so didn't see them.
If you don't read this group, then don't crosspost to it. And don't run
discussions across several groups.
cu
59cobalt
--
"The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it
seriously inconveniences the user."
--http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: firewall on budget ?
- From: Leythos
- Re: firewall on budget ?
- From: jameshanley39@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: firewall on budget ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Trouble with Security Update installing over and over and over
- Next by Date: Copy XP User Profiles - Permission Denied
- Previous by thread: Re: firewall on budget ?
- Next by thread: Re: firewall on budget ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
