Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]" <lanwench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:41:04 -0400
In news:1155577742.389993.124170@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
borntom <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
To distinguish between the two computers, I call them
'computer/server' and 'computer/client'. The identification happens
when a TCP session betwenn the two computer has still been started.
It means that the computer/server in question does identify itself to
the other computer/client which 'wants' to manage it via Server
Message Block (SMB) and queries the computer/server capabilities via
SMB/NetServerGetInfo as:
'Server Type: 0x0000001' which means it (computer/server) is a
'Workstation'
but it should identify itself as 'Server Type: 0x0001003' which menas
it is a 'Workstation', 'Server' and 'NT Workstation'.
This wrong identification does only happen sometimes on some
computers. I can send you a WireShark trace if you want to.
No, that's OK, thanks. I guess I'm not really sure what the issue is here
anyway - maybe I'm missing something. A server has a workstation service. A
workstation has a server service.
OK, being not able to browse is a disadvantage one have to bear if
'NetBIOS over TCP/IP' is disabled.
Yep, and there are other things (legacy apps, etc) that will not work if
it's disabled.
Best regards
Thomas
Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] schrieb:
In news:1154671608.592392.324640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
borntom <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> typed:
It's not a matter of name resolution. Using WINS or DNS or the IP
itself, the result is always the same, the computer itself wrongly
identify itself, as soon as you disable NetBIOS.
What exactly does "wrongly identifies itself" mean?
Well on some
computers, not all and not all of the time. Using regmon or filemon
from sysinternals I could not find a reason. I also could not find a
registry key which has something to do as which the computer
identifies itself.
So the conclusion is: We were using NetBIOS including WINS, we
wanted to use only DNS, but turning off NetBIOS did produce non
predictable results on some Windows XP computers, so we turned it
back on.
You might as well, honestly. It's still used and needed more than
you think. And frankly, I really like being able to browse.
Thanks to all for their feedback.
Thomas
Steven L Umbach schrieb:
That is weird as usually using the IP address works as it removes
the need to use name resolution. I can't say much more as to why it
does not work on SP2 as I have never had a need to disable NBT. You
may also want to post in the networking newsgroup to see if anyone
there has seen the same behavior. In my opinion disabling NBT does
little to nothing to improve network security. Using ipsec, if
needed, would do a whole lot more to increase network security
including requring that computers authenticate with each other
before access is allowed on defined ports/protocols/IP and the
ability to encrypt and guarantee authenticity of network traffic.
Steve
"borntom" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154415859.757093.41590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Using the IP does not help, the computer still identifies itself
as 'Server Type: 0x0000001' and not as 'Server Type: 0x0001003'.
On the computers, which still identify themselves correct, we had
no problems without 'NetBIOS over TCP/IP'.
In addition since 'My Network Places' is broadcast based and
therefore every device can claim to be everything via broadcast
disabling 'NetBIOS over TCP/IP' and therefore loosing 'My Network
Places' is one step to more security.
Steven L Umbach schrieb:
You could try using the computers IP address as a workaround.
Otherwise you
will probably have to keep using netbios over tcp/ip. Is there a
specific reason why you feel the need to disable netbios over
tcp/ip??
Steve
"borntom" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1154355477.343577.29080@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
After disabling 'NetBIOS over TCP/IP' via DHCP some of our
computers can not be managed remotely. So far, it seems only to
affect computer running Windows XP SP2. The strange thing is
that this happens not all of the time, sometimes after a reboot
everything as OK and vice versa.
When attempting to connect to one of the computers in question
using computer management (from any server or workstation) one
receives this message:
Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not
running Windows NT. Would you like to manage it anyway?
Some other remote administration tools do not work at all.
After using Wireshark it turned out the computer does identify
itself via Server Message Block (SMB) NetServerGetInfo as
'Server Type: 0x0000001' and not as 'Server Type: 0x0001003'.
That means that the computer identifies itself incorrectly only
as 'Workstation' and not as 'Workstation', 'Server' and 'NT
Workstation'.
The identification as 'Server' and 'NT Workstation' should be
carried out if 'File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks'
is installed and activated on the network interface card,
according to http://support.microsoft.com/kb/262597/en-us and
our observations. Sadly reinstalling 'File and Printer Sharing
for Microsoft Networks' does only fixes the problem till the
next reboot. Reinstalling the 'Client Microsoft for Networks'
doesn't fix the problem longer than the next reboot.
Re-enabling 'NetBIOS over TCP/IP' via DHCP does fix the
problem, but want to have 'NetBIOS over TCP/IP' disabled.
The were some posts mentioning the same problem:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&q=%22Computer+*+cannot+be+managed+because+it+is+not+running+Windows+NT%22&Submit3=Search
We think it could be an error in Windows XP SP2.
Is there anyone with an idea how this problem can be fixed? Any
help would be appreciated.
.
- References:
- Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: borntom
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: Steven L Umbach
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: borntom
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: Steven L Umbach
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: borntom
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]
- Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- From: borntom
- Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- Prev by Date: Re: Log on to Windows XP Pro
- Next by Date: Re: Log on to Windows XP Pro
- Previous by thread: Re: Computer \\computername cannot be managed because it is not running Windows NT
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Restore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|