Re: DRA is Decrypting Files when it shouldn't be!!!



I just reproduced what you did and was not able to access the files as the
RA though I rebooted the computer after encrypting the files and before
logging on as the built in administrator account to create the RA. ---
Steve


"DJ" <DJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:C715850F-53CC-43A8-8EED-87F77BF49319@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Let's go over this again...
>
> OS setup:
>
> Installed a fresh copy of XP. Forget about extra RA's. There is only one
> RA
> with this setup. I dedicated the Administrator's account as the RA.
>
> Problem:
>
> EFS is allowing the RA to decrypt 200 files that were encrypted BEFORE an
> RA
> was actually created on the XP OS. My question is Why?
>
> I was told by "many people" that you have to setup the RA BEFORE enabling
> encryption to get the RA to decrypt encrypted files.
>
> Steps I took:
>
> I created a user, encrypted 200 files. Logged off and logged on as
> Administrator and created a RA. Rebooted and logged in as Administrator
> and
> decrypted the 200 files.
>
> In this case here, I created the RA after the files were already
> encrypted,
> so why am I ABLE to decrypt the 200 files?
>
> Anyway, to resolve the problem, you asked me to do an experiment and told
> me
> to "export" & "delete" the user's private key, before creating the RA. I
> did
> this, and now the RA cannot delete the 200 files (which is the way it
> suppose
> to work)
>
> My question is, why did you suggest to "export" & "delete" the user's
> private key, then create the RA? And also why does this work and what did
> I
> do wrong?
>
> Thanks, Dave
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>> So what did you exactly do? Create a user, encrypt some files, remove
>> the
>> user' EFS certificate private key, create an RA, and not be able to
>> decrypt
>> files as RA or did you use your current configuration where the RA could
>> decrypt user's files, remove user's EFS certificate private key, and RA
>> can
>> no longer decrypt files?? Did you look to see if RA had more then one RA
>> certificate?? --- Steve
>>
>>
>> "DJ" <DJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:C7D62C3E-C1AA-46A1-93E1-D66DE97010B5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Steve, I did what you said (below) and "exported" & "deleted" the
>> > user's
>> > private key and now it's acting correctly. Why is this?
>> >
>> > I don't understand, please explain.
>> >
>> > Thanks, DJ
>> >
>> > "Steven L Umbach" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hmm. Have you tried that first exporting/deleting the user's private
>> >> key
>> >> before creating the RA to see what happens or rebooting the computer
>> >> before
>> >> you created the RA with cipher /R with the user's private key still
>> >> on
>> >> the
>> >> computer? XP is supposed to flush EFS cache at logoff. Did you remove
>> >> any
>> >> old RA from the RA user certificate store via mmc snapin for
>> >> certificates
>> >> and then logoff as the RA? You can use efsinfo to see what RAs are
>> >> included
>> >> in a user's EFS file and examine the certificate thumbprint to see
>> >> exactly
>> >> what RA certificate is being used if there are more than one
>> >> available.
>> >> You
>> >> might also want to post in the Microsoft.public.security.crypto
>> >> wsgroup. --- Steve
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "DJ" <DJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:583E06D2-2DEA-4BCE-AE5A-6B2590CD52A6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >I setup a brand new XP install. Setup a new local user named Joe and
>> >> >logged
>> >> > in as Joe . Created a new directory and encrypted 200 files in this
>> >> > directory.
>> >> >
>> >> > Logged off and and logged in as Administrator. Created a DRA (ex:
>> >> > Cipher
>> >> > /r:Filename, imported certificate and private key into the local
>> >> > certificate
>> >> > store, Ran gpedit.msc and added DRA.). After this, I tried to
>> >> > unencrypt
>> >> > the
>> >> > directory while logged in as Administrator and it let me!!! Why is
>> >> > this?
>> >> > It
>> >> > shouldn't allow me to decrypt 200 files that were encrypted before a
>> >> > DRA
>> >> > was
>> >> > created.
>> >> >
>> >> > I don't get this crap. Many articles state that you have to create
>> >> > the
>> >> > DRA
>> >> > before encrypting the files so that the DRA can decrypt them. If you
>> >> > don't
>> >> > then, you need to run cipher /u to update the encrypted files so
>> >> > that
>> >> > the
>> >> > newly created DRA will work with older encrypted files.
>> >> >
>> >> > In my case, I created the DRA after the files were already encrypted
>> >> > and
>> >> > "never" ran a cipher /u. Does anybody know what could cause this?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks, DJ
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: RA doesnt work after encrypting in XP
    ... >I am setting up a standard procedure for encrypting the data folders on ... > as deleting the RA private key using certmgr.msc. ... This works fine and I am able to decrypt them as ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)
  • Re: PGP
    ... Subject: PGP ... > encrypting an email with PGP, then providing the key to decrypt it is ... Anyone can use that key to decrypt the email. ... Only the recipient's private key (which is not [and should not ...
    (Security-Basics)
  • RE: Problem while decrypting
    ... Decrypt will decrypt ANY GARBAGE ... in CBC mode a block error affects only two ... simple hash: attach the hash value of the original data at the end, ... > i was encrypting the data using the pass phrase. ...
    (microsoft.public.platformsdk.security)
  • Re: Using CryptoStream
    ... You don't bother spending time trying to decrypt something that cannot possibly be encrypted ... As soon as the decrypted stream can be recognized as invalid, ... The main difference is that you have to do this verification anyway, so the work to implement the code is already done, whereas adding a signature just adds to the code you have to include. ... I mentioned decrypting as the only reliable way to know whether you can avoid _encrypting_ something. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • ACT MASK DriveEncription Trashed My Drive
    ... ACT MASK DriveEncription Trashed My Drive ... for my number which I put in and my mistake was encrypting my drive ... DiskEncryption 4.01 Download ... decrypt it first, then update to 4.01 ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.security)